philosophy meta-forum

What is going on at European Journal of Philosophy?

Reinhardt

10 day(s) ago

I keep hearing murmurs of unrest about this journal. Has it gone downhill since Bob Stern stood down as chief editor, e.g., in terms of review-times or general organisation?

Heraclides

10 day(s) ago

It is corrupt.

Pseudo-Grosseteste

9 day(s) ago

It is corrupt.

Heraclides

Could you explain?

Valentino

9 day(s) ago

Try to keep up, Heraclides is just a religious nutter who thinks we are all in a Fallen State. See the JW thread.

It is corrupt.

Heraclides

Could you explain?

Pseudo-Grosseteste

Nicholas

9 day(s) ago

I haven't submitted to it, but several friends have. 1-year review times just aren't acceptable.

Gustav

9 day(s) ago

Perhaps. I had a 6m+ original review time, then an r&r. It's been months since I resubmitted. I submitted to them because of the quick turnaround.

Chiao

9 day(s) ago

They have a reputation for ~1 month review times. Has something changed?

Pasquale

9 day(s) ago

They have a reputation for ~1 month review times. Has something changed?

Chiao

Well, evidently. Read Nicholas' comments above!

Alvin

9 day(s) ago

They have a reputation for ~1 month review times. Has something changed?

Chiao

Shrug. Maybe they do. I know two people who recently waited a little over a year.

Pavel

9 day(s) ago

I haven't submitted to it, but several friends have. 1-year review times just aren't acceptable.

Nicholas

It's the norm in most journals in ancient philosophy. and the tenure clock is ticking....

Roscoe

9 day(s) ago

FWIW, I've reviewed for them a few times in recent years and everything seemed healthy to me. They encourage fast reviews and it seems the reviews I was involved with were turned around in about a month.

Reinhardt

9 day(s) ago

They use to be a lot faster under Stern's management -- and somehow the quality of accepted papers was also generally better..

Antony

7 day(s) ago

It is corrupt.

Heraclides

Could you explain?

Pseudo-Grosseteste

It's a gravy train for friends of the editor. See for yourself:

https://sites.google.com/site/ispsphenomenology/participants

Galen

2 day(s) ago

It is corrupt.

Heraclides

Could you explain?

Pseudo-Grosseteste

It's a gravy train for friends of the editor. See for yourself:

https://sites.google.com/site/ispsphenomenology/participants

Antony

I don't know why that site is relevant for the discussion. Does EJP have anything to do with this society for phenomenology?!


Allowed tags: 'p', 'b', 'em', 'blockquote'. URLs are automatically linkified.
posts per page.